If you’re searching for the best sneakers in 2026, you’re likely balancing comfort, style, and performance. The Nike Women’s Run Swift 3 stands out for lightweight running, while the New Balance 574 Core offers timeless style for everyday wear. The main tradeoffs often involve choosing between specialized performance features and all-day versatility. Continue reading for a detailed breakdown of the top options and what makes each one unique.
Key Takeaways
- Performance sneakers like Nike’s Run Swift 3 excel for runners, but may sacrifice all-day comfort for some users.
- Casual styles such as the New Balance 574 combine timeless design with reliable comfort, ideal for daily wear.
- Budget-friendly options like Under Armour Charged Assert series deliver solid performance without premium price tags.
- Premium sneakers like the adidas Streettalk offer fashionable appeal but come with a higher cost and sometimes less flexibility.
- Size and fit consistency vary across brands, making try-ons or detailed sizing guides essential for online shoppers.
| Nike Women’s Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes |  | Best for Daily Runners Seeking Comfort and Support | Weight: 8.4 oz | Upper material: Mesh | Midsole: Foam | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Nike Men’s Air Max Excee Shoes |  | Best for Casual Style with Modern Comfort | Weight: 10.2 oz | Upper material: Synthetic | Cushioning: Air Max unit | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Under Armour Men’s Charged Assert 11 Running Shoes |  | Best for Neutral Runners Seeking Durability and Support | Weight: 10.2 oz | Upper material: Mesh with leather overlays | Midsole: Charged+ foam | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| New Balance Women’s 327 Sneaker |  | Best for Casual Vintage Style with Reliability | Origin: Imported | Sole material: Rubber | Outer material: Rubber | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| New Balance Women’s 515 V3 Sneakers |  | Best for Versatile Everyday Comfort and Style | Fabric type: Mesh | Origin: Imported | Sole material: Rubber | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| New Balance Men’s 608 V5 Casual Comfort Cross Trainer |  | Best Support and Comfort for Casual and Light Training | Fabric type: 100% Leather | Origin: Imported | Sole material: Rubber | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| adidas Women’s Streettalk Shoe |  | Best Statement Sneaker with Bold Style | Origin: Imported | Sole material: Rubber | Outer material: Rubber | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Under Armour Men’s Charged Assert 10 Shoes |  | Best Lightweight and Responsive Running Shoe | Fabric type: Mesh | Origin: Made in the USA or Imported | Sole material: Rubber | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| New Balance Women’s 608 V5 Casual Comfort Cross Trainer |  | Best Support and Comfort for Women’s Casual and Light Activity | Fabric type: 100% Leather | Origin: Imported | Sole material: Rubber | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| adidas Men’s X_PLR Path Shoes |  | Best Casual Everyday Comfort | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown | |||
| Under Armour Men’s Charged Assert 9 Running Shoe |  | Best Overall for Versatile Running | Fabric type: 100% Leather | Origin: Imported | Sole material: Rubber | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| adidas Women’s X_PLR Path Running Shoes |  | Best for Casual Everyday Wear | Origin: Imported | Sole material: Synthetic Rubber | Outer material: Rubber | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Women’s Running Shoes |  | Best Versatile Running Shoe with Style | Midsole: Fresh Foam | Upper: Breathable mesh with no-sew overlays | Outsole: Rubber | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Nike Women’s Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes |  | Best Lightweight Road Running Shoe | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown | |||
| New Balance Women’s 574 Core Sneaker |  | Best Sustainable Classic Sneaker | Fabric type: 50% Synthetic, 50% Mesh | Origin: Imported | Sole material: Rubber | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| sneaker | Origin | Sole material | Outer material | Midsole |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nike Women’s Run Swift 3 Road | — | — | — | Foam |
| Nike Men’s Air Max Excee Shoes | — | — | — | — |
| Under Armour Men’s Charged Ass | Imported | — | — | Charged+ foam |
| New Balance Women’s 327 Sneake | Imported | Rubber | Rubber | — |
| New Balance Women’s 515 V3 Sne | Imported | Rubber | Rubber | Cushioned foam |
| New Balance Men’s 608 V5 Casua | Imported | Rubber | Leather | EVA foam |
| adidas Women’s Streettalk Shoe | Imported | Rubber | Rubber | — |
| Under Armour Men’s Charged Ass | Made in the USA or Imported | Rubber | Mesh | Charged Cushioning foam |
| New Balance Women’s 608 V5 Cas | Imported | Rubber | Leather | — |
| adidas Men’s X_PLR Path Shoes | — | — | — | — |
| Under Armour Men’s Charged Ass | Imported | Rubber | Mesh | — |
| adidas Women’s X_PLR Path Runn | Imported | Synthetic Rubber | Rubber | Cloudfoam |
| New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi | — | — | — | Fresh Foam |
| Nike Women’s Revolution 8 Road | — | — | — | — |
| New Balance Women’s 574 Core S | Imported | Rubber | Polyester | EVA foam with bio-based content |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Nike Women’s Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes
The Nike Women’s Run Swift 3 stands out for its lightweight design, making it a top choice for runners who prioritize comfort over long-distance durability. Compared with the New Balance Women’s 515 V3, which emphasizes everyday versatility, the Swift 3 offers a more supportive cushion tailored for regular running sessions. However, its limited color options and narrower fit might be a drawback for some users. This shoe is ideal for women who run daily and want a reliable, lightweight trainer without the need for extensive customization or style variety.
Pros:- Lightweight and comfortable for daily running
- Supportive cushioning enhances comfort
- Durable construction for regular use
Cons:- Limited color options
- May run narrow for some users
Best for: Women who want a lightweight, comfortable shoe for daily running and training sessions.
Not ideal for: Runners with wider feet or those seeking extensive color choices and a more robust aesthetic.
- Weight:8.4 oz
- Upper material:Mesh
- Midsole:Foam
- Outsole:Rubber
- Design:Road running
- Color options:Limited
Our verdict“This shoe suits daily runners who value comfort and support in a lightweight package.”
Nike Men’s Air Max Excee Shoes
The Nike Air Max Excee offers a fresh take on the classic Air Max silhouette, providing a stylish yet comfortable option for everyday wear. Compared to the Under Armour Charged Assert 11, which emphasizes support and cushioning for running, the Excee leans more toward casual style, with a sleek design and lightweight feel. Its limited color palette and narrow fit may not suit everyone, especially those with wider feet. This pick makes the most sense for men who want a versatile sneaker that can transition from casual outings to light activity without sacrificing style.
Pros:- Stylish design with modern updates
- Comfortable cushioning for all-day wear
- Lightweight construction for easy wearing
Cons:- Limited color options
- May run narrow for some feet
Best for: Men seeking a fashionable, comfortable sneaker for everyday casual use.
Not ideal for: Runners or athletes needing maximum support or for those with wider feet who may find it too narrow.
- Weight:10.2 oz
- Upper material:Synthetic
- Cushioning:Air Max unit
- Design:Lifestyle
- Color options:Limited
- Fit:Narrow
Our verdict“Ideal for men who prioritize style and comfort for casual daily activities over intense athletic performance.”
Under Armour Men’s Charged Assert 11 Running Shoes
The Charged Assert 11 is tailored for neutral runners who need a balanced mix of cushioning and support. It surpasses the New Balance 515 V3 in terms of midsole softness and traction, thanks to its Charged+ foam and rubber outsole with flex grooves. However, its weight of over 10 ounces might feel a bit heavy for speed-focused runners, and the design may not appeal to those looking for a minimalist aesthetic. This shoe is best for runners who want reliable daily trainers with durability and a touch of recycled content, but less so for those prioritizing ultra-lightweight performance.
Pros:- Comfortable midsole cushioning for all-day wear
- Durable rubber outsole with traction and flexibility
- Supportive upper with leather overlays
Cons:- Weight may be slightly heavy for some runners
- Design might not appeal to minimalist preferences
Best for: Neutral runners who want comfortable, durable shoes for daily training and support.
Not ideal for: Speed-focused runners or those seeking minimalist, lightweight footwear for racing or fast-paced activities.
- Weight:10.2 oz
- Upper material:Mesh with leather overlays
- Midsole:Charged+ foam
- Outsole:Rubber with flex grooves
- Recycled content:At least 30%
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“A solid choice for neutral runners prioritizing durability and support over ultra-lightweight design.”
New Balance Women’s 327 Sneaker
The New Balance 327 excels in delivering a fashionable retro look, reminiscent of 1970s running shoes, with a bold oversized N logo. Compared with the New Balance Women’s 515 V3, which leans toward versatile everyday wear, the 327 emphasizes style and standout design. Its lightweight construction and durable rubber outsole make it suitable for casual outings, though it’s less appropriate for vigorous athletic activity. This sneaker is perfect for women who want a vintage-inspired statement piece that pairs well with casual outfits but don’t need high-performance features.
Pros:- Stylish retro-inspired design with bold branding
- Lightweight and comfortable for daily wear
- Durable rubber outsole for reliable grip
Cons:- Not suitable for intense athletic activities
- Material combination may require maintenance
Best for: Women looking for a stylish, vintage-inspired sneaker for everyday casual wear.
Not ideal for: Those needing a high-support athletic shoe or engaging in intense physical activities.
- Origin:Imported
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Rubber
- Inner material:Leather
- Design style:Retro
- Lugged outsole:Yes
Our verdict“A fashionable choice for women who want a vintage look with everyday comfort and durability.”
New Balance Women’s 515 V3 Sneakers
The New Balance 515 V3 offers an all-around casual sneaker that balances breathable materials with cushioned comfort. It stands out for its versatility compared to the Nike Women’s Revolution 8, which leans more toward sporty aesthetics. The 515 V3’s combination of mesh and suede provides breathability and style, while the cushioned midsole ensures comfort for prolonged wear. Its rubber outsole adds traction, making it a reliable wardrobe staple. However, the limited color options and lack of high-impact support mean it’s less suited for vigorous athletic use. This sneaker makes sense for anyone looking for a dependable, stylish everyday shoe that pairs with most outfits.
Pros:- Breathable mesh and suede upper for comfort and style
- Cushioned midsole for all-day wear
- Reliable rubber outsole for traction
- Versatile design pairs with various outfits
Cons:- Limited color options
- May lack support for high-impact activities
Best for: Women seeking a comfortable, versatile sneaker for daily casual wear and light activities.
Not ideal for: High-impact sports enthusiasts or those requiring extensive arch or ankle support.
- Fabric type:Mesh
- Origin:Imported
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Rubber
- Midsole:Cushioned foam
- Design:Casual
Our verdict“A dependable, stylish sneaker perfect for everyday casual comfort and versatile dressing.”
New Balance Men’s 608 V5 Casual Comfort Cross Trainer
This model stands out for its durability and all-day comfort, making it an excellent choice for those who need reliable support during casual wear or light workouts. Compared with the New Balance 574, the 608 V5 offers a more structured support system thanks to its dual density collar and reinforced suede upper, but it may require a break-in period due to its stiffer leather. The ABZORB heel cushioning ensures impact absorption, which is beneficial for extended wear, though the limited color options might not appeal to everyone seeking variety. Its lightweight EVA midsole balances cushioning and stability, ideal for daily use without feeling bulky. Tradeoffs include a possible initial stiffness and fewer style choices, but it excels in durability and comfort.
Pros:- Durable suede leather upper provides support and a classic look
- ABZORB heel cushioning absorbs impact for comfort
- Lightweight EVA foam midsole offers cushioning and stability
- Minimal interior seaming reduces irritation
Cons:- May require breaking in for a perfect fit
- Limited color options
Best for: Casual wearers who prioritize support and durability for everyday use
Not ideal for: Fashion-focused buyers seeking a wide range of colors or more stylish aesthetics
- Fabric type:100% Leather
- Origin:Imported
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Leather
- Upper material:Suede Leather
- Heel cushioning:ABZORB heel crash pad
- Midsole:EVA foam
- Support features:Dual density collar, Phantom Liner
Our verdict“This cross trainer is best suited for those seeking durable support and comfort during casual activities or light workouts.”
adidas Women’s Streettalk Shoe
This shoe makes a statement with its shell-toe design, standing out more than the New Balance 608 V5 for its fashion-forward appeal. It’s ideal for those who want a distinctive look for daily casual wear, though it sacrifices breathability due to its synthetic upper and limited ventilation options. Compared to the New Balance 327, it offers a more classic sneaker silhouette, but with less versatility in styling. The rubber sole provides solid grip, and the lace-up closure offers a secure fit, though the synthetic materials may feel less comfortable over extended periods or in hot weather. Tradeoffs include less breathability and fewer color options, but it delivers a bold, street-ready aesthetic.
Pros:- Stylish shell-toe design for a bold look
- Comfortable synthetic upper and textile lining
- Secure lace-up closure for a customizable fit
Cons:- Limited color options
- Potentially less breathable material
Best for: Fashion-conscious women wanting a standout sneaker for daily casual outfits
Not ideal for: Athletes or those seeking high breathability and comfort during extended activity
- Origin:Imported
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Rubber
- Closure type:Lace-Up
- Upper material:Synthetic
- Lining:Textile
Our verdict“This sneaker is perfect for style-driven individuals looking to elevate their everyday casual look with a bold statement piece.”
Under Armour Men’s Charged Assert 10 Shoes
This pick excels in providing a lightweight and breathable experience, making it more suitable for active runners than the heavier New Balance 608 V5. Its mesh upper promotes airflow, while the EVA sockliner delivers soft comfort underfoot. The Charged Cushioning midsole offers responsive support, ideal for running or high-impact activities, though it may lack the stability features found in more support-oriented models like the New Balance 608 V5. The rubber outsole is durable, especially in high-impact zones, but the overall weight savings mean less structured support for walking or casual wear. The tradeoff is a focus on breathability and responsiveness at the expense of support for prolonged or heavy-duty use.
Pros:- Lightweight and breathable mesh upper for airflow
- Responsive Charged Cushioning midsole
- Durable rubber outsole with high-impact zone coverage
Cons:- Potential chemical exposure warning (chromium compounds)
- Limited color options
Best for: Active runners and those needing a lightweight shoe for high-mobility workouts
Not ideal for: Casual wearers who prefer more support or cushioning for all-day comfort
- Fabric type:Mesh
- Origin:Made in the USA or Imported
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Mesh
- Insole:EVA sockliner
- Midsole:Charged Cushioning foam
- Outsole:Solid rubber
- Offset:10mm
Our verdict“This shoe is best for runners or active users prioritizing lightweight responsiveness over all-day support in casual settings.”
New Balance Women’s 608 V5 Casual Comfort Cross Trainer
Similar to the men’s version, the New Balance Women’s 608 V5 offers durable support with its suede leather upper and impactful ABZORB heel padding. It’s tailored for women who need dependable cushioning and a secure fit for casual wear or light workouts. The adjustable lace-up design provides a customizable fit, while the reliable traction makes it versatile across various surfaces. Compared to the New Balance 574, this model emphasizes support and longevity over fashion versatility, though initial stiffness can be a concern. Its heavier weight and limited color options might deter those seeking a more lightweight or stylish sneaker. Tradeoffs include initial stiffness and weight, but it excels in support and durability.
Pros:- Durable suede leather upper with a classic look
- Excellent impact absorption with ABZORB heel cushioning
- Adjustable lace-up for a secure fit
- Reliable traction on various surfaces
Cons:- May feel stiff initially due to leather upper
- Heavier than some athletic trainers
- Limited color options
Best for: Women needing a durable, supportive sneaker for casual and light training activities
Not ideal for: Those looking for lightweight or highly fashionable sneakers for everyday style
- Fabric type:100% Leather
- Origin:Imported
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Leather
- Heel cushioning:ABZORB heel pad
- Upper material:Suede leather
- Closure:Lace-up
- Footbed:Cushioned
Our verdict“This sneaker is ideal for women seeking durable, supportive footwear for casual wear and light activity.”
adidas Men’s X_PLR Path Shoes
This model is designed for those who want a lightweight, stylish shoe for daily casual use, making it less feature-rich than the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 but more focused on style and ease of wear. Its minimal details and simple construction prioritize comfort and versatility over technical features, making it perfect for relaxed outings or errands. The lack of specific support features or technical specs means it’s best for light, everyday wear rather than rigorous activity. Compared to the New Balance 608 V5, it’s significantly lighter and less supportive, but for users who prefer a sleek, fuss-free sneaker, this is a practical choice. Tradeoffs include limited support and durability details, but it excels in style and weight.
Pros:- Lightweight construction for easy wear
- Stylish and minimal design
- Suitable for everyday casual wear
Cons:- Limited information on specific features
- No details on durability or support
Best for: Casual users who want a lightweight, stylish sneaker for daily errands or outings
Not ideal for: Active users or those needing supportive or durable athletic footwear
Our verdict“This sneaker is well-suited for those prioritizing style and comfort over technical performance for everyday casual use.”
Under Armour Men’s Charged Assert 9 Running Shoe
The Under Armour Charged Assert 9 stands out for its combination of lightweight design and reliable support, making it a strong choice for runners who need a versatile shoe. Compared with the Nike Revolution 8, it offers better stability thanks to its durable leather overlays, though it’s slightly heavier and less suited for intense trail running. Its responsive Charged Cushioning midsole ensures comfort over longer distances, but the leather overlays can add weight, potentially impacting speed. This shoe suits runners seeking durability and comfort in a daily trainer without sacrificing breathability. However, if someone prioritizes minimal weight or advanced trail features, they might prefer other options.
Pros:- Breathable mesh upper for ventilation
- Durable leather overlays for stability
- Responsive cushioning for comfort
- Solid rubber outsole for durability
Cons:- May be less suitable for intense trail running
- Leather overlays could add weight
Best for: Runners who want a durable, supportive shoe for daily training and moderate workouts
Not ideal for: Trail runners or athletes who need ultra-lightweight or specialized trail shoes
- Fabric type:100% Leather
- Origin:Imported
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Mesh
- Weight:Lightweight
Our verdict“This shoe is ideal for daily runners prioritizing durability, support, and comfort in a versatile package.”
adidas Women’s X_PLR Path Running Shoes
The adidas Women’s X_PLR Path makes the list for its sleek, low-profile design that works well for everyday use, especially for women who prefer a stylish sneaker. Compared to the New Balance Women’s 574, it feels lighter and more modern, but it might lack the same level of all-day support and durability for extended wear. Its breathable textile and synthetic mesh upper keep feet cool, while the Cloudfoam midsole offers cushioned comfort for casual walks or light runs. However, the shoe’s limited arch support means it may not be suitable for those needing extra stability or for prolonged standing. This pick suits fashion-conscious users who want comfort without bulk, but not those requiring heavy-duty support.
Pros:- Lightweight and breathable design
- Comfortable Cloudfoam midsole
- Good grip and durability from rubber outsole
Cons:- May lack arch support for some users
- Not ideal for high-impact activities
Best for: Women seeking a versatile, stylish sneaker for daily errands and light activity
Not ideal for: Athletes or runners who need high arch support or advanced stability features
- Origin:Imported
- Sole material:Synthetic Rubber
- Outer material:Rubber
- Closure type:Lace-Up
- Upper material:Textile and synthetic mesh
- Midsole:Cloudfoam
Our verdict“This sneaker is perfect for casual wear and light activity, especially for those prioritizing style and comfort.”
New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Women’s Running Shoes
The New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi v4 earns its spot for offering a balance of comfort and style, suitable for both casual wear and training. Unlike the Nike Revolution 8, which is lighter and very minimal, the Arishi v4 provides a more cushioned experience with its Fresh Foam midsole, making it preferable for longer runs or extended walking. Its breathable mesh upper and durable rubber outsole enhance usability across various activities, but the design might feel too sporty or bulky for casual outfits. This shoe is ideal for those who want a comfortable, supportive trainer that doubles as a casual sneaker, but less so for minimalist enthusiasts or those seeking ultra-lightweight options.
Pros:- Lightweight and cushioned for all-day comfort
- Breathable mesh upper
- Durable rubber outsole for traction
- Sleek no-sew design reduces bulk
Cons:- May lack arch support for some users
- Design may be too sporty for casual wear
Best for: Women looking for a versatile, cushioned trainer suitable for running and casual outings
Not ideal for: Minimalist sneaker fans or runners who prioritize ultra-lightweight gear
- Midsole:Fresh Foam
- Upper:Breathable mesh with no-sew overlays
- Outsole:Rubber
- Closure:Lace-up
Our verdict“This model suits active women seeking a comfortable, supportive shoe that transitions well between running and casual use.”
Nike Women’s Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes
The Nike Women’s Revolution 8 makes the list for its straightforward design that prioritizes comfort and breathability, making it an excellent choice for daily road running. Compared to the Under Armour Charged Assert 9, it’s lighter and less feature-rich, lacking some support and stability elements but excelling in weight reduction and ventilation. Its mesh upper and cushioned insoles promote cool, comfortable runs, though it falls short on advanced stability or trail-ready features. This shoe is best for runners focused on road workouts and easy mileage, but not for those needing extra stability or trail performance.
Pros:- Lightweight and comfortable for daily running
- Breathable mesh upper
- Good cushioning for support
Cons:- May lack advanced stability features
- Limited color options
Best for: Women who want a lightweight, breathable shoe for daily road runs and casual fitness routines
Not ideal for: Trail runners or athletes needing high stability or support features
Our verdict“Ideal for everyday runners seeking a breathable, lightweight shoe for consistent road workouts.”
New Balance Women’s 574 Core Sneaker
The New Balance Women’s 574 Core offers a classic look with an eco-friendly twist, thanks to its bio-based EVA midsole and recycled rubber outsole. Compared with the adidas Women’s X_PLR, it provides more substantial support and a traditional silhouette, although it tends to be heavier and bulkier. Its suede and mesh upper deliver a timeless style, but the heavier build might not appeal to minimalist fans. This sneaker is perfect for consumers seeking sustainability without sacrificing all-day comfort, but those who prioritize ultra-lightweight or fashion-forward designs may prefer other options.
Pros:- Uses sustainable materials in midsole and outsole
- Comfortable all-day support with ENCAP cushioning
- Adjustable lace closure for a personalized fit
Cons:- Limited color options (not specified)
- May be heavier than minimalist sneakers
Best for: Environmentally conscious consumers who want a supportive, stylish everyday sneaker
Not ideal for: Minimalist sneaker enthusiasts or those needing lightweight performance shoes
- Fabric type:50% Synthetic, 50% Mesh
- Origin:Imported
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Polyester
- Midsole:EVA foam with bio-based content
- Midsole cushioning:ENCAP
Our verdict“This sneaker is best suited for eco-conscious buyers who want a classic, supportive shoe with sustainable features.”
How We Picked
Our evaluation focused on key aspects that matter most to sneaker buyers: comfort, durability, versatility, and value. We considered performance features such as support and cushioning, alongside style and build quality. Price was also a factor, ensuring options cater to different budgets. The ranking reflects a balance between everyday usability and specialized performance, with top picks excelling across multiple criteria. We prioritized products that offer clear advantages in their categories, while also noting significant tradeoffs for each choice.| sneaker | Origin | Sole material | Outer material |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nike Women’s Run Swift 3 Road | — | — | — |
| Nike Men’s Air Max Excee Shoes | — | — | — |
| Under Armour Men’s Charged Ass | Imported | — | — |
| New Balance Women’s 327 Sneake | Imported | Rubber | Rubber |
| New Balance Women’s 515 V3 Sne | Imported | Rubber | Rubber |
| New Balance Men’s 608 V5 Casua | Imported | Rubber | Leather |
| adidas Women’s Streettalk Shoe | Imported | Rubber | Rubber |
| Under Armour Men’s Charged Ass | Made in the USA or Imported | Rubber | Mesh |
| New Balance Women’s 608 V5 Cas | Imported | Rubber | Leather |
| adidas Men’s X_PLR Path Shoes | — | — | — |
| Under Armour Men’s Charged Ass | Imported | Rubber | Mesh |
| adidas Women’s X_PLR Path Runn | Imported | Synthetic Rubber | Rubber |
| New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi | — | — | — |
| Nike Women’s Revolution 8 Road | — | — | — |
| New Balance Women’s 574 Core S | Imported | Rubber | Polyester |
